The REST API is pretty much exactly what you'd expect. GitHub actually has two distinct APIs you can use to interact with it: Installing Octokit.GraphQL and creating a connection.Unfortunately, GitHub have blocked the account I was using to migrate, so the comments still aren't visible on the discussions yet 🙁 More on that later… I was really hoping that I would have finished migrating all the comments by now.
LOCK ME NOW 2 GITHUB HOW TO
I show how to search and fetch discussions, how to create discussions, and how to create comments. NET app using the Octokit.GraphQL NuGet package. In this post, I describe how to interact with the GitHub discussions API from a. I described how I exported the comments to XML, cleaned the data, and converted it to a format I could use to create the comments on GitHub discussions. here using git-pull's upload-pack now we coordinate in team just for alerting, and sometime don't and handle locks by this script of mine, so even if someone didn't recieve the alert can still be working without worry.In my previous post, I described the overall process of migrating comments from Disqus to giscus using a small. so even if two XMLs are technically same, but from file's and git's prespective they are always very different files, so we coordinate using chat groups to stop working on one XML when someone is already working.
LOCK ME NOW 2 GITHUB MANUAL
check out this git repo of mine here i achieve the same using git-pull's upload-pack.įor background, in our project we have import/export functionality that generate XMLs on exporting and when there are multiple XML pushes from multiple persons it become extremly difficult to do manual merging XMLs as its structure changes on every export. you can also alter git-upload-pack command to trigger warning if some files are locked, at the time ot pull requests, or repo update, if you want, but i don't recomment that, as that will make git update/upgrade difficult. and put (pre|post)-recieve hooks to disallow changes if pushed by someone other then who locked it initially. like using git pull's upload-pack to trigger command on server that will invoke some command(manually written) on server that will handle file locking in some way. Other solution is to use git in some way to achiveve the same result. This is already explained more clearly in other answers. But this require you to migrate the git repo, installing git-lfs alters git repo, and uninstalling require you to migrate again to git repo. One is using git-lfs that is used for large file system. However, there are ways by which we can achieve the same result. Git is a distributed version control tool, so centralising files to lock them is against its devlopment philosphy, so its not possible. Is there a quick way (read, existing extension) to do this with Github or should we use the same hooks that we would use with git?
However, we could not find any github extensions or push hooks for the same. There can be one final review git pull to upstream. One method we thought might work is to have hooks when the git push is done to the origin (fork). Also, this might happen in the later cycles of development and hence the project might be jeopardized. Though this seems fine, the problem is when a big project gets delivered, it brings in lots of changes for review and hence, increases the load for the file owners.
LOCK ME NOW 2 GITHUB CODE
In Github, we are planning to use the Fork-Clone model - each project a group of dev is working on will do a fork, each developer will do a clone of the fork, write the code & commit to origin, the lead of the feature will do a pull request to upstream. The unlocking is preceded by a code review. Three of us are the owners of the total 150+ files. We have a process in SVN where in individual files are locked and whenever a developer wants to commit code, he needs to get it unlocked by the owner of the file. We are a team of 60+ developers working on the same product and are moving from SVN to Git and GitHub.
0 kommentar(er)
